
A pharmacy that offers the venöse Blutentnahme (venous blood draw) needs a written Standardarbeitsanweisung (standard operating procedure) for it. This is not optional paperwork, because ApBetrO § 35b Abs. 1 places the blood draw inside the Qualitätsmanagementsystem, and the Apothekenbetriebsordnung (ApBetrO) is what a pharmacy is supervised against.
The second reason matters more on a bad day. When a customer faints, bruises badly or disputes what they were told beforehand, the SOP with the signed documentation is the pharmacy's main Haftung (liability) defence. Without one the Apothekenleiter argues from memory.
One date needs clearing up. The 1 September 2026 SOP deadline in the trade press sits in § 129 Abs. 5e SGB V as rewritten by the Apothekenversorgung-Weiterentwicklungsgesetz (ApoVWG), and it binds the Bundesapothekerkammer. Pharmacies carry no dated SOP deadline, only the content obligation and the one week notification.
ApBetrO § 35b Abs. 1 names six areas where the Qualitätsmanagementsystem carries written rules: preparation, Aufklärung (patient information) and consent, Anamnese (medical history) with the decision on when a draw does not happen, the draw itself, documentation, and Hygienemaßnahmen.
ApBetrO § 2 Abs. 3b adds three conditions: a suitable room with the equipment needed for blood draws und für den Umgang mit Komplikationen (for dealing with complications), a Betriebshaftpflichtversicherung (business liability insurance) covering harm from blood draws, and a notification to the state authority in this wording:
Der Apothekenleiter hat die Durchführung von Blutentnahmen und die dafür vorgesehenen Räumlichkeiten spätestens eine Woche vor Aufnahme der Blutentnahmen gegenüber der zuständigen Behörde anzuzeigen.
The room rule itself sits in ApBetrO § 35b Abs. 3, which adds that the room is not used for anything else during a blood draw and that privacy is protected.
ABDA publishes an Arbeitshilfe der Bundesapothekerkammer zur Qualitätssicherung called Standardarbeitsanweisung Durchführung der Blutuntersuchungen in der Apotheke, Stand der Revision 14 May 2024, under the Leitlinie Physiologisch-chemische Untersuchungen. Its structure is short: Gegenstand, Geltungsbereich, Zuständigkeiten, a Verfahren part covering Vorbereitung der Messung, Probenahme, Probeanalyse and Nachbereitung, then Dokumentation and mitgeltende Unterlagen.
The limit is the subject matter. It describes the kapilläre Blutentnahme (capillary blood draw) from a fingertip measured in the pharmacy, and it predates § 11c ApoG. There is no Aufklärung section, no Anamnese section and no consent step. Result handling ends at a plausibility check against a Referenzwert, so there is no Ergebnismanagement, no escalation route and nothing on sending a sample to an akkreditiertes Labor.
That gap is why a pharmacy cannot adopt it unchanged for a venöse Blutentnahme sold as a Selbstzahlerleistung (self-pay service). It remains a useful skeleton for hygiene, and what a venous procedure adds carries the liability. The two methods are compared in capillary versus venous blood testing.
| SOP section | Rule it satisfies | Record the rule requires |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose and scope | ApBetrO § 2a Abs. 1 | Documented description of the procedure |
| Qualification and delegation | ApBetrO § 35b Abs. 2, § 11c ApoG | Confirmed ärztliche Schulung and documented Schulungsmaßnahmen |
| Room and equipment | ApBetrO § 35b Abs. 3, § 2 Abs. 3b Nr. 3 | Room description, equipment for complications, single use |
| Aufklärung and consent | ApBetrO § 35b Abs. 4 | Dated confirmation of Aufklärung and consent |
| Anamnese | ApBetrO § 35b Abs. 1 Nr. 3 | Dated entry, including appointments without a draw |
| Draw and hygiene | ApBetrO § 35b Abs. 1 Nr. 4, Abs. 6 | Named performer, supervising Apotheker, Hygieneplan in force |
| Documentation and retention | ApBetrO § 35b Abs. 5 | Eight listed data points, kept ten years |
| Insurance and notification | ApBetrO § 2 Abs. 3b | Betriebshaftpflichtversicherung for blood draws and a dated Anzeige |
An SOP written once and never reviewed is worse than none, because it documents a procedure the pharmacy has stopped following. The fix is a header with a version number, author, approver, effective date and next review date, plus a change log.
Two events reset that clock. A change to how the blood draw is carried out, and a change to the rooms used for it, are both notified to the authority one week beforehand under ApBetrO § 2 Abs. 3b. Moving to a different room is a version change and a notification, not a quiet edit.
Responsibility for the venöse Blutentnahme stays with the Apothekenleiter, who approves and signs the SOP even when a colleague drafted it. Each person named in it signs to confirm they have read the version in force.
ApBetrO § 35b Abs. 2 also requires the pharmazeutisches Personal supporting preparation and documentation to be sufficiently qualified and regularly trained, with the training documented. One session per version, a record of who attended, and the ärztliche Schulung certificates in one place covers the evidence. Pricing sits outside the SOP and belongs with self-pay services in the pharmacy.
Room first, then insurance confirmation, then the SOP, then the notification: that order causes the least rework, because the notification names the rooms and the procedure.
Aniva publishes an editable Standardarbeitsanweisung template for the venöse Blutentnahme, structured along the sections above, for pharmacies that would rather adapt a draft than start from an empty page. No chamber or authority has endorsed it, and the Apothekenleiter signs it.
Yes. ApBetrO § 35b Abs. 1 requires the Qualitätsmanagementsystem to carry written rules for preparation, Aufklärung and consent, Anamnese, the draw, documentation and hygiene. No format is prescribed, so the obligation is about content.
Not for a venöse Blutentnahme. The ABDA Arbeitshilfe covers capillary blood testing measured in the pharmacy, has no Aufklärung, Anamnese or consent section, and its result handling ends at a plausibility check. Those are the sections a venous procedure most depends on.
Not for individual pharmacies. The 1 September 2026 date applies to the Bundesapothekerkammer and its recommendations for the pharmazeutische Dienstleistungen. What binds a pharmacy is the content obligation in ApBetrO § 35b and the one week notification.
Yes. ApBetrO § 2 Abs. 3b requires changes to the rooms, or to how the blood draws are carried out, to be notified one week before they take effect. A room move is therefore a version change in the SOP as well as a letter to the authority.
The Apothekenleiter approves and signs it, because responsibility stays with the pharmacy leadership. Everyone named in the document confirms in writing that they have read the version in force. ApBetrO § 35b Abs. 2 adds that supporting pharmazeutisches Personal is regularly trained, with the training documented.
This article is general information about German pharmacy law and business practice, not legal advice. The responsible Apothekerkammer or a lawyer decides individual cases.